1. BOARD MEMBERS
The Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute (NSWBI) is managed
by a Board of Directors. The Board is comprised of representatives
from the blueberry industry, the Nova Scotia Agricultural
College, and the Federal and Provincial Departments of Agriculture.
| David
Sangster |
NSWBI Chairman, Director,
Production Technology Branch, Nova Scotia Department of
Agriculture and Marketing, Truro |
| Lorne
Crozier, P.Ag. |
NSWBI Secretary,
Entomologist, Production Technology Branch, Nova Scotia
Department of Agriculture and Marketing, Truro |
| Bruce
Mowatt |
Representative
of the Wild Blueberry Producers' Association of Nova Scotia |
| Keith
Crowe |
Representative
of the Wild Blueberry Producers' Association of Nova Scotia |
| Colleen
Cameron |
Representative
of the Wild Blueberry Producers' of Nova Scotia |
| Andrew
Jamieson, PhD |
Plant Breeder,
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agricultural Center,
Kentville |
| Kenna
MacKenzie, PhD |
Entomologist, Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada, Agricultural Center, Kentville |
| David
Percival, PhD |
Wild Blueberry
Research Chair, Department of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro |
| Bruce
Gray, PhD |
Vice-Principal
(Acting), Academic, Nova Scotia Agricultural College,
Truro |
| Dale
McIsaac, P.Ag. |
Lowbush Blueberry
Specialist, Production Technology Branch, Nova Scotia
Department of Agriculture and Marketing, Nappan |
| Andrew
King |
NSWBI Field Manager,
Production Technology Branch, Nova Scotia Department of
Agriculture and Marketing, Truro |
2. INTRODUCTION
The Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute began in 1983 with
the appointment of Board Members by the Honourable Roger Bacon,
Minister of Agriculture and Marketing. Since its creation, the
Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute has continued to make contributions
to the blueberry industry under the management of its appointed
Board Members. During the 1999/00 season, the main objectives
(coordinating grower oriented research and providing assistance
to the lowbush blueberry industry) were successfully achieved
by providing demonstration projects, educational programming,
and technical resources. 3. ACTIVITY
SUMMARY
The Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute in the 1999/00 season
was both active and productive. A number of new projects were
initiated and ongoing projects continued to receive support.
Activities at the Field Station (located in the Debert Air
Industrial Park) in 1999/00 included: the general maintenance
of Institute buildings, demonstration areas and research plots;
the provision of field sites for new and ongoing trials; and
the provision of support to the researchers and their projects
by the Field Manager and summer students.
The WBPANS Annual Field Day was held this year on July 31,
1999 in the Rawdon and Gore areas of Hants County. NSWBI staff
was actively involved in the preparation and organization
of this event.
The NSWBI was involved in an internship program from September,
1999 to March, 2000, in collaboration with the Business and
Youth Industry Internship Program. The successful candidate,
Sara Reid, was involved in the implementation and coordination
of seven new research and extension projects, along with many
other NSWBI and WBPANS activities. 4. RESEARCH
PROJECTS
Projects may receive support from the NSWBI in different ways.
This support could include: human resource, technical, mechanical,
financial, and land provision. A brief description of each project
and their activities in the 1999/00 year are presented on the
following pages. Further information and clarification arising
from developed interest in a particular project can be obtained
from that project's leader.
4.1 Research Projects: Dr.
Leonard Eaton
Dr. Leonard J. Eaton,
Oxford Frozen Foods Ltd. Research Professor,
Dept of Environmental Sciences, NSAC, Truro, NS
4.1.1 Pruning Methods for
Wild Blueberries at the NSWBI Field Station.
Collaborator: Andrew King, NSDAM
The objective of this study is to compare growth and production
of blueberries pruned by three methods over a number of production
cycles.
There were no differences among the three pruning treatments
(oil burn, straw burn, mow) over six production cycles (no
yield data for the 1994 -1995 cycle), nor were there consistent
differences among the treatments for total stem length, buds
per stem or blossoms per stem. These results suggest that
the type of pruning has no influence on growth and production
of the wild blueberry when fertilizers are not applied. The
expected completion of this project is yet to be determined.
4.1.2 Pollinating Wild Blueberries
Profitably.
Collaborators: Dawn Wickstrom, NSAC; Diane Dunlop, NSAC;
John Tait, NSAC
The objective of this study is to determine an economical
"break even" point for stocking wild blueberry fields, based
on production data over four years.
Production data from all of the pollination study fields
from the past four years was obtained from the producers,
and that from 152 fields was fed into the analysis program
and tested to determine the level of hive numbers per acre
(stocking rate) that would provide maximum return to the producer.
That number for the 152 fields over the four years was 1.25
hives per acre. Future analysis will address more fields,
the economic level in individual years, and the level in fields
with data over several production cycles.
4.1.3 Effects of Mulches
on Spread of Blueberries.
Collaborators: Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC; Andrew King, NSDAM.
The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness
of several types of mulches to encourage blueberry rhizome
growth and spread.
Very little spread has been noted since the mulches were
applied in the fall of 1997. A second application of mulches
is planned for 2000.
4.1.4 Effects of Gypsum
and Fertilizer on Wild Blueberries.
Collaborators: Kevin Sanderson (project leader), AAFC
The objective of this study is to assess the effects of
gypsum and fertilizer, singly and in combination, on growth
and development of the wild blueberry.
Applications of gypsum + fertilizer resulted in longer stems
than in control plots, but had no effect on buds, blossoms
and fruit yield over the first production cycle. Leaf tissue
levels of sulphur remained high in plants from plots amended
with gypsum in 1998. Soil levels of nutrients varied among
the five sites included in the study. Completion date for
this project is 2002.
4.1.5 Two Versus Three-Year
Management of Wild Blueberries.
Collaborators: Andrew King, NSDAM; Doug Wyllie, Bragg Lumber
Company
The objectives of this project are as follows: 1) to compare
the effects of two-year management (1 crop) and three-year
management (2 crops) on blueberry development and yield; 2)
to compare fertilization and non fertilization on both management
types; 3) to compare burning and mowing.
This 12-year study will be completed in 2000. At that time,
we will be able to compare the two-year and three year management
practices, as well as mowing versus burning and fertilizer
versus no fertilizer, over two production cycles.
4.1.6 Rates of Phosphorus
on Wild Blueberries.
Collaborators: Kevin Sanderson, AAFC; Dr. G.W. Stratton,
NSAC; Dr. P.R. Warman, NSAC; Ryan Ring, NSAC
The objectives of this study are as follows: 1) to assess
the effects of increasing levels of phosphorus fertilizer
on blueberry growth and production; 2) to determine the fate
and effects
Levels of phosphorus in both leaf tissue and soils increased
with increased level of phosphorus fertilizer applied (0 to
92 kg P2O5 ha-1 ) during the 8 seasons of the study. There
were no differences in stem length, buds, blossoms or yields
among the treatments. Level of phosphorus in plots amended
with high rates of P remain high. Ryan Ring is testing several
soil extractants to determine the one best suited for wild
blueberry soils. Residual effects of the different rates will
be followed over the next several cycles. The expected completion
date for this project is 2005.
4.1.7 Site Specific Management
of Wild Blueberry Fields.
Collaborators: Dr. K. MacKenzie, AAFC; Dr. P. Hicklenton,
AAFC; Dr. K. Jensen, AAFC; Dr. N. Nickerson, AAFC; Dr. P.
Hildebrand, AAFC; Rick Delbridge, NSDAM; Gary Patterson, AAFC;
Dr. Rob Gordon, NSDAM; Carl Esau, NSDAM; Lorne Crozier, NSDAM;
Dale McIsaac, NSDAM; Andrew King, NSDAM; Gary Brown, Bragg
Lumber Company.
The long term goal of this study is to develop sustainable
management strategies for wild blueberry production; short
term goals include: 1) to measure and assess variability within
commercial fields with respect to field characteristics, plant
growth and production; 2) to develop optimum site specific
management practices related to factors that influence production;
3) to develop variable rate technologies to apply rate specific
management practices to fields.
Soil and tissue samples have been obtained from seven commercial
fields, including two (Adams and Esau) that are part of an
M.Sc. study by William Malay. Grids were set out at each field
and soil and tissue samples were taken at each grid point
that had blueberries. Data obtained varied considerably within
and among the fields assessed. Several years and many fields
will likely be required for us to determine the most appropriate
methods for assessing site variability.
4.1.8 Effects of Moss on
Wild Blueberries.
Collaborators: Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC; Dr. K. Jensen,
AAFC; Gary Patterson, AAFC; Andrew King, NSDAM; Dale McIsaac,
NSDAM; Dr. D. Percival, NSAC; Glen Sampson, NSAC; Katriona
MacNeil, NSAC; Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company.
The objectives of this study are as follows: 1) to assess
the extent and influence of mossy patches in fields on numbers
of blueberry stems, stem length, buds, etc.; 2) to develop
methods for moss control in commercial fields.
Preliminary investigations in 1999 showed that several commercial
blueberry fields had varying amounts of moss (primarily Polytrichum
spp.), with North Nova (Earltown) having nearly 30% cover.
At the North Nova field, blueberry plants were severely restricted
in moss patches (100% moss cover) compared to areas without
moss. These data suggest that full moss cover will reduce
potential blueberry yields over time. During 2000, we plan
to expand the research to include the biology and life cycle
of the moss, soil pH and nutrient levels, extent of moss problems
in the industry, and explore some possible controls.
4.1.9 Mowing Efficiency in
Wild Blueberry Fields.
Collaborators: Doug Wyllie, Bragg Lumber Company
The objectives of this study are as follows: 1) to determine
if mowing at different heights alters plant growth and production;
2) to determine the most economical plant height at which
to mow; 3) to compare spring and fall mowing.
Initial stem lengths after mowing at both sites (spring
at Adams and fall at Murray Siding) varied with the height
of mowing, but there were no differences in plant height by
July at either site. At the Adams field, buds per stem and
fresh fruit yields did not differ from each other. Production
data will be gathered from the Murray Siding field in 2000.
The data to date suggest that mowing height does not affect
fruit production in wild blueberries. The expected project
completion date is 2000.
4.2 Research Project: Ryan
Ring
Ryan Ring, Graduate Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.2.1 A Comparison of Five Extraction
Methods for Determining Available Soil Phosphorus in Nova
Scotia Blueberry Soils.
Collaborators: Dr. P. R. Warman (co-supervisor), NSAC;
Dr. G. W. Strattor (co-supervisor), NSAC, Dr. L. J. Eaton,
NSAC
The objective of this project is to determine the best predictor
of plant available phosphorus, for the lowbush blueberry,
from the following methods: Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, Bray 1,
Modified Morgan and the Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM). This
project was initiated in 1999 with three newly established
sites and two sites in long term experiments, conducted by
Dr. L.J. Eaton. One of these long term sites is located at
the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute, and was set-up to
study the phosphorus requirements of the lowbush blueberry.
In 1999, soil samples were taken in April (spring), and at
harvest in August (late summer) from the NSWBI. Along with
the soil samples obtained at harvest, tissue samples were
obtained to allow for correlation of the soil phosphorus to
the phosphorus present in the tissue. These samplings will
be repeated in the summer of 2000, with the late summer samples
obtained at tip dieback. Thus far, various background soil
characteristics have been measured; and the Mehlich 1, Mehlich
3 and Bray 1 extractions of the spring and late summer soil
samples have been completed. However, no statistical analysis
of this data has been completed. The anticipated completion
date of this project is April 2001.
4.3 Research Project: Dr.
David Percival
Dr. David Percival
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.3.1 Influence of Nitrogen Formulation
and Application Date on the Plant Nutrition, Growth and Development,
and Yield of Wild Blueberries.
Collaborators: NSWBI; WPBANS; and Bragg Lumber Company.
A study examining the influence of nitrogen formulation
and application date was initiated at the Nova Scotia Wild
Blueberry Institute and at a commercial field at Westbrook
N.S. Nitrogen applications consisted of applying 25 kg·ha-1
N on 15 October 1997, and 15 May 1998 with the nitrogen source
consisting of ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, or urea.
No deleterious effects of autumn nitrogen applications on
winter hardiness were observed in this study. No significant
differences in stem length, floral bud number, fruit zone
length, and node number were present between autumn and spring
fertilized treatments. A significant effect of nitrogen source
was present, with the ammonium sulphate treatments having
longer stems, a greater number of floral buds, greater node
number, greater berry number, and greater harvestable yield
than the control. Therefore, results from this preliminary
experiment indicate that yield potential of lowbush blueberries
can be influenced by nitrogen formulation. However, before
recommendations are made, more replication is required, and
the main and interactive effects of nitrogen, phosphorous,
and potassium fertilizers needs to be examined.
4.4 Research Project: Angela
Dryden
Angela Dryden, Fourth Year Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.4.1 Impact of simulated acid rain on
photochemistry, morphology, and yield components of the lowbush
blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.).
Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; NSWBI;
and Glen Sampson, NSAC.
As of 1998, anthropogenic sources are estimated at releasing
100 to 130 million tons per year of sulfur dioxide emissions
and 60 to 70 million tons per year of nitrous oxide emissions
(Nebel and Wright, 1998). Acid rain is a problem that affects
plants, animals, and insects, thus it is important we know
as much as possible about it. Both the indirect (i.e. photochemistry)
and direct (i.e. leaf lesions) effects of simulated acid rain
are of importance to perennial crops such as the lowbush blueberry
(Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Since lowbush blueberries
are a two-year crop, the cumulative effects of acid rain can
be increased because the plant has to sustain injury for two
years instead of one.
The objectives of the following investigation were to: find
a threshold at which acid rain will cause damage to the blueberry
plant, determine the impact on photochemistry, characterize
the morphological damage to the vegetative and reproductive
components, and lastly determine the effect on crop yield.
The field experiment was carried out at the Nova Scotia
Wild Blueberry Institute in Debert, NS on wild lowbush blueberries
in their cropping year of production. A latin square experimental
design was used with five replications, five treatments, a
plot size of 5 by 5 m, and a buffer between plots of 2 m.
The treatments used consisted of simulated sulfuric acid rain
(diluted H2SO4) at pH's of 5.6 (control), 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, and
1.5. After eight application dates fluorescence and net photosynthesis
measurements were taken. Enough plant and berry samples were
taken to determine the effects of acid rain on yield components
and yield.
Although there is a significant decrease (8%) in the fluorescence
origin, there was no significant difference between maximal
fluorescence, quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry, net
photosynthesis, or wax deposition in either leaf or berry.
No significant effects of net photosynthesis could be due
to the lowbush blueberries being hypostomatous (stomata are
on the bottom of the leaf). The acid rain solution was not
being absorbed through the stomata and affecting the photochemistry.
It can be observed that both berry and leaf wax deposition
increased as pH lowered. The epicuticular wax layer may help
negate the effects of the acid rain treatments.
Of the yield components, stem length treatments were not
significantly different from each other. Significant effects
of acid rain treatments on total node number, berry weight,
and berry number were present with pH 1.5 treatment having
6% fewer nodes, 30% greater berry weight, and 35% higher berry
number than the control. There was no observed significant
difference between the treatments of quadrat yield.
Overall, there were no direct effects to the lowbush blueberry
(fluorescence, net photosynthesis, epicuticular wax, yield
components and yield) by the simulated acid rain treatments.
If there is any negating effect present it may take numerous
growth cycles for it to become apparent in components that
were measured. There may also be a beneficial aspect, as the
elemental sulfur in the acid rain provides a micro nutrient
that is deficient in blueberry soils. However, this study
was only conducted for one season, there may be a cumulative
effect over a number of seasons.
4.5 Research Project: Bonna
Jordan
Bonna Jordan, Graduate Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.5.1 Impact of Living Mulches on the
Environment and Growth Dynamics of the Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium
angustifolium Ait.).
Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; Gary
Patterson, AAFC; Gordon Brewster, NSAC; NSWBI; WBPANS; and
Bragg Lumber Company.
There has been an increase in the use of herbicides such
as hexazinone (Velpar) which destroy weeds and produces bare
spots. With no vegetative cover these bare spots are susceptible
to soil erosion and their microclimate conditions (e.g. temperature
and drought stress) are not very favorable for blueberry growth.
During mechanical harvesting the blueberry rhizomes are ripped
and destroyed which also reduces the coverage of blueberries
and produces bare spots susceptible to erosion. Soil erosion
has become a major problem in Nova Scotia's wild blueberry
fields. It has been proposed that this problem can be minimized
by using living mulches (companion crops) to improve soil
stability and microclimate conditions and therefore reduce
erosion in blueberry fields which will in turn cause an expansion
in blueberry coverage and increase the yield and profit.
The objective of this study is to determine the effects
of living mulches on the physical and chemical environment
and growth dynamics of the lowbush blueberry. This is being
determined by examining; 1) The physical environmental conditions
which will be monitored by measuring the temperature, moisture
and pH of the soil, 2) Changes in soil stability and hydraulic
conductivity and 3) Changes in the growth dynamics, biomass
productivity and establishment of the lowbush blueberry and
living mulch. Studies examining the use of introduced living
mulches are being conducted at two commercial fields in 1999
and 2000 near Upper Stewiacke and Rawdon, Nova Scotia. A randomized
block experimental design will be used with the treatments
consisting of (1) a control (no living mulch), (2) a creeping
red fescue, hard fescue, and perennial ryegrass mixture, and
(3) a birdsfoot trefoil, tall fescue, and perennial ryegrass
mixture.
Results show no detrimental interactions occurring between
the living mulch and lowbush blueberry and an improvement
in soil physical conditions (i.e. hydraulic conductivity).
With these improvements the blueberries have an increased
potential of spreading into these once bare areas resulting
in a decrease of soil erosion and an expansion in blueberry
coverage.
4.6 Research Project: Cheryl
Konoff
Bonna Jordan, Graduate Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.6.1 Seasonal Changes in Nutrient Dynamics
of Wild Blueberry Production.
Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; NSWBI;
WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company.
With the exception of carbon and oxygen, which are supplied
via the atmosphere, plants acquire nutrient elements from
the soil. Nutrients are an essential requirement for plant
growth and development with 16 inorganic nutrients being required
to ensure the normal growth and development of a plant. The
demand for a nutrient is dependent upon its function within
a plant and its relative mobility. The nutrient concentration
within a particular tissue can vary over the span of a growing
season, and is dependent upon the assimilation and allocation
patterns, and also the potential remobilization of specified
nutrients. More specifically the rhizomes of the lowbush blueberry
constitute a large proportion of the biomass of a wild blueberry
and are thought to be a large storage or source organ for
nutrients (Smagula and DeGomez, 1987). However, the relative
strength of the rhizome as a source for nutrients is uncertain
and insufficient information is available on the seasonal
nutrient dynamics of the lowbush blueberry.
Consequently, the objectives of this investigation were
to examine the nutrient dynamics of the lowbush blueberry
in the sprout and cropping phases of production over the span
of a growing season.
This study was conducted throughout the 1997 and 1998 growing
seasons at the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute. A completely
randomized experimental design was used with four replications
in the sprout and cropping fields. Three whole plant samples
were collected on six different days beginning in May and
ending in September. Leaf, root, and rhizome samples were
collected, dried, ashed and analyzed for nutrient content
using the methodology of (Perrin, 1999). The concentration
(%) of phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, and potassium and the
concentration (ppm) of boron were examined.
This study provides preliminary insight into the inorganic
source/sink dynamics of the lowbush blueberry. With the exception
of phosphorus levels of leaf tissue in the sprout year, leaf
tissue concentrations were higher than the roots and rhizomes.
As the blueberry leaves matured, evidence of a reduction in
phosphorus and potassium and accumulation of calcium and magnesium
were present. Such results are typical of a growing plant
(Jones, 1998), and indicate the differences in assimilation
and allocation that occur amongst nutrients.
All nutrients except phosphorus are within the optimal ranges
required for growth of the leaves as described by Smagula
and DeGomez (1987). Boron levels in the leaf tissue were not
sufficient at the start of the season, but did increase throughout
the season. However, when processes such as pollen tube growth
and berry development were occurring, boron deficiencies may
have been encountered. In addition, no evidence of remobilization
of nutrients from the rhizotomous tissue to the leaves and
roots was present with nutrient level not changing significantly
over the span of the growing season. Therefore, results from
this study cast doubt on the importance of the rhizotomous
tissue as a nutrient reservoir. However, only two seasons
of data have been used in this study, and more replication
is required before pertinent conclusions can be made.
4.7 Research Project: Lindsay
Hainstock
Lindsay Hainstock, Graduate Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.7.1 Getting Back to Basics: Carbon
Assimilation and Allocation in Wild Blueberry Plants.
Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; J. P.
Prive, AAFC; Dr. N. Crowe, NSAC; NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg
Lumber Company.
There are three general avenues used to increase the production
of any crop; improved genetics, decreased competition of pests
or disease and improved management practices. Up until now,
research has focused on increasing production by the introduction
of fertilizers, pesticides, and new production techniques
(Eaton, 1994). Choices were based on trial and error approaches,
without attempting to understand how the plant grows. The
basic physiology of most important agronomic crops has already
been determined and used to aid producers. An understanding
about the fundamental physiology of a crop is important for
making optimum management decisions that will maximize results
without wasting time and resources. (Hall et al. 1971; Fernandez
and Pritts, 1994). This includes an understanding of the efficiency
of the plant to utilize light energy, assimilate and metabolize
carbon, nutrient dynamics, and source/sink relationships.
The objectives of this experiment were to measure
the assimilation rate of carbon and how it is allocated
throughout the lowbush blueberry plant for both the sprout
and crop growing season.
CARBON ASSIMILATION: Photosynthetic and fluorescence
readings will be taken weekly throughout the growing season
for both the crop and sprout stages of production. A LI-COR
portable photosynthesis measurement system (LI-6200; LI-COR
Inc.) was used for measuring net photosynthetic rate. The
leaves will be removed and the leaf area determined using
a LI-Cor leaf area meter (LI-3100, LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska).
The pigments will be extracted using 80% acetone and the concentration
will be measured using a spectrophotometer.
CARBON ALLOCATION: Whole plant samples were taken
for a given area. The plant material within the area will
be separated into roots, rhizomes, shoots, and berries. Dry
weights will be determined for each section. The number of
vegetative and reproductive nodes as well as stem length will
also be determined for each area. The dried samples will then
be ground for use in determining the non-structural carbohydrates.
Carbohydrate analysis will be determined using HPLC with an
NH4+ based column. The carbohydrates that will be measured
are glucose, sucrose, fructose, and starch. Starch content
will be analyzed by being broken down into glucose units and
run through the HPLC.
It would be very beneficial to increase the efficiency of
research by first understanding the normal growth of the lowbush
blueberry. By understanding the way a plant distributes energy
and growth, decisions can be made that utilizes the natural
cycle of the plant and maximizes yields with minimal inputs.
This applies to such things as timing of fertilizer application.
Knowing when the plant is most actively growing and will benefit
the most from an applied fertilizer, would reduce the amount
of fertilizer being wasted through leaching and erosion as
occurs with excessive applications. Understanding the physiology
of the plant is also beneficial in determining indicators
that can be used to predict plant yield in the fields (Angus
et al.1993) or for choosing high production cultivars (Forsyth
and Hall, 1965).
4.8 Research Project: Peter
Burgess
Peter Burgess, Graduate Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.8.1 Efficacy and Crop Phytotoxicity
of Several Herbicides on Commercial Wild Blueberries Vaccinium
angustifolium Ait. and Introduced Living Mulches.
Collaborators: Dr. Glen Sampson (co-supervisor), NSAC;
Dr. D. Percival (co-supervisor), NSAC; Andrew King, NSWBI;
and Sara Reid, NSWBI.
This study involved two distinct phases. A herbicide screening
study was done at the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute,
from which herbicides that showed low phytotoxic effects could
be tried on a second phase, an introduced living mulch greenhouse
trial at the NSAC. This trial looked at the herbicide effectiveness
on the introduced living mulches and also looked at herbicide
tolerance.
The NSWBI portion of the study involved a section of relatively
homogenous, semi-commercial wild blueberry field, used to
test the phytotoxic effects of 11 treatments on the blueberry
plants. Treatments of a standard, (hexazinone, applied to
entire treatment area earlier in spring after burning), imazethapyr,
nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, chlorimuron,
Flumetsulam/metolachlor, fluazifop-p-butyl, prosulfuron, rimsulfuron-elim,
quizalofop-ethyl and clethodim were applied, on top of the
hexazinone application before full emergence. Phytotoxic characteristics
were rated for each plot on a 0-9 scale ( 0 = nil affect,
9 = plant death ). Ratings were done at one, four, and eight
weeks after application.
The greenhouse study was set up as a completely randomized
design and involved five different living mulch species (Creeping
Red Fescue, Hard Fescue, Sheep Fescue, Perennial Rye Grass,
and Birdsfoot Trefoil). Fluazifop-p-butyl, prosulfuron, nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron
(Ultim), tribenuron-methyl, hexazinone, and a control (no
herbicide application) were applied on each of the five living
mulches and replicated five times. The living mulches were
then rated for phytotoxic effects at one, two, and four weeks
after the herbicide applications. It was determined which
living mulches have the best tolerance against full herbicide
applications which showed low phytotoxic effects on lowbush
blueberries.
In the field trial at the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute
Chlorimuron, imazethapyr and flumetsulam/metolachlor produced
mean phytotoxic effects greater than (2.75). This high rate
was deemed to be unacceptable for further study at full rate.
Fluazifop-p-butyl (Fusillade), prosulfuron (Peak), and nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron
(Ultim) showed mean phytotoxicity ratings lower than (2.75)
and had desirable action spectrums.
The broad spectrum herbicides nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron and
hexazinone, showed a very high phytotoxic activity when applied
to the introduced living mulches in the greenhouse. However,
there was some tolerance with creeping red fescue and sheep
fescue when fluazifop-p-butyl and tribenuron-methyl were applied.
Further study into varying rates of different herbicides should
be done to develop an integrated vegetation management plan.
4.9 Research Project: Vimy
Glass
Vimy Glass, Graduate Student
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS
4.9.1 Effect of Soil Moisture
on the Growth and Development of the Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium
angustifolium Ait.) - A Field Study.
Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; John
Proctor, U of Guelph; J. P. Prive, AAFC; and Dr. R. Olson,
NSAC; NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company.
As we enter the twenty-first century, the lowbush blueberry
(Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) is becoming highly valued
for its health benefits especially its antioxidant properties.
Greater consumer usage will demand an increase in production
efficiency. Consequently, research interests are focusing
upon increased potential and actual yield through a better
understanding of the growth, development, and optimal management
practices for the crop. Moisture is necessary for flower bud
development and for increasing blueberry weight (Benoit et
al., 1984). Indigenous blueberries maximize their weight
and volume three to four weeks prior to harvest. Therefore,
rain or irrigation applied at the start of this period would
be most effective for increasing fruit size (Hall and Forsyth,
1967).
The objectives of the field study were to examine the effect
of soil moisture availability (supplemental irrigation, moisture
stressed) on i) leaf gas exchange, and ii) vegetative
and reproductive growth of the lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium
angustifolium Ait.). This study was conducted during the
1998/ 1999 growing seasons at the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry
Institute (NSWBI) in Debert (45o
26' N, 63th 27' W), Nova Scotia.
Two soil moisture conditions were used as treatments (irrigated,
moisture stressed) as well as a rainfed control and were arranged
in a randomized block design. Plot sizes measured 304.8 cm
(10 ft) by 304.8 cm (10 ft) with 60.96 cm (2 ft) buffers between.
Water was restricted on moisture stressed plots through the
use of portable rainout shelters (Clawson et al., 1986).
Transparent acrylic sheets measuring 66.04 cm (26 in) by 243.84
cm (96 in) were used as covers and securely attached corner
to corner ensuring little movement from the wind. During the
growing season, the shelters were placed over the moisture
stressed plots only where there was a >50% chance of rain.
A weekly supplemental irrigation schedule was followed. Applications
of 20 mm of water were be supplied to each plot. Rain gauges
were positioned throughout the irrigation plots to ensure
a uniform, correct application. Parameters measured included
photosynthesis, chlorophyll and carotenoid content, stomatal
conductance and stomatal density, stem water potential, yield
components (stem length, node and floral node numbers, flowering
zone length, number of flowers, berry number and sample yields),
and soil moisture. At this time, statistical analysis is being
completed and conclusions can not be provided.
4.9.2 Influence of Decreasing
Soil Moisture on Stem Water Potential, Transpiration Rate,
and NCER of the Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium
Ait.) - A Controlled Environment Study.
Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; John
Proctor, U of Guelph; J. P. Prive, AAFC; and Dr. R. Olson,
NSAC; NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company.
Increased consumer demand has prompted an urgency in a greater
understanding of environmental conditions on the growth and
development of the lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium
Ait.). Breeding efforts are limited due to the fact that
the fruit are marketed as an indigenous crop. Therefore, increased
demand can be met by improving production efficiency through
a greater understanding of the physiology of the crop. As
such the objectives of this study attempted to determine the
direct short term effects of decreasing water availability
on stem water potential, transpiration rate and NCER in the
lowbush blueberry.
Wild blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) were
placed in computer regulated growth chambers in the Dept.
of Plant Agriculture, at the University of Guelph, Guelph,
ON. The effects of moisture stress were measured using a randomized
complete block design were results were blocked by chamber
and there were two levels of moisture availability as the
experimental factor, moisture stressed and control. The growth
chambers monitored net carbon exchange rate (NCER). Additionally
stem water potential was recorded using in situ temperature
corrected psychrometers (P.W.S. Instruments, Inc., Guelph,
Ont.) and transpiration rates were measured gravimetrically.
Soil moisture was monitored using Theta probes (Delta-T Devices
Ltd, Cambridge, UK).
The study lasted approximately 120 hours spanning four complete
illumination cycles. Preliminary statistical analysis of the
full model provided averages of each of the three parameters
of interest. Further analysis with multiple regression provided
parameter estimates. Diurnal patterns were observed in all
parameters of interest. Significant treatment effects between
stem water potentials were found in the third and fourth illumination
cycles. However, due to fluctuations in readings, no linear
or quadratic equations could be fitted to the data. Transpiration
rates began at the same levels (i.e., same intercept, linear
and quadratic slopes). The linear and quadratic slope estimates
remained consistent between the drought and control while
the intercepts in the moisture stressed plants decreased.
The photosynthetic estimates for the first illumination cycle
was the same in both the control and drought plants, 3.17
µmol·m-2·s-1.
Over the course of the study, the drought plants displayed
higher intercepts estimates yet lower slope estimates leading
to a decrease in photosynthetic rates. During low water availability,
the substantial decrease in stem water potential coupled with
the conservative photosynthetic and transpiration rates indicate
the lowbush blueberry is a drought tolerant plant in the short-term.
Physiological adaptations in response to environmental variability
during the reproductive cycle of the indigenous blueberry
will be further examined in the filed portion of this study.
4.10 Research Project: Gloria
Pickett
Gloria Pickett, Acting Weed Specialist
Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing, Truro,
NS
4.10.1 Controlling Black
Bulrush by Spot Spraying with Ultim at the Nova Scotia Wild
Blueberry Institute.
Collaborator: Andrew King, NSDAM.
The objective of this experiment was to observe the level
of control of Black Bulrush by spot spray with Ultim (nicosulfuron/
rimsulfuron). The project was set up as a randomized complete
block design. Plot size measured 1m by 1m, with a 0.5 m buffer
zone between replications. There were two Ultim application
times, the first in June 1999, and the second in September,
1999. The four treatments tested are as follows: (1)Control;
(2) 67g/800L H2O (June 22,
1999); (3) 67g/800L H2O (September,
1999); (4) 100g/800L H2O (June
22, 1999); and (5) 100g/ 800L H2O
(September 1999). Each treatment was replicated four times.
Crop tolerance and weed control was rated using the 0-9 Rating
Scale used by the Expert Committee on Weeds. The results of
the June application of Ultim showed moderate injury, noticed
by bronzing of the leaves. Overall, the June applications
did not give 100% control, but did suppress the growth and
prevented it from going to seed. Treatment 4 was the most
successful at controlling the Black Bulrush. It is advisable
from this project that fruit bud formation should be looked
at closer in the future. This project also looked at lowbush
blueberry crop tolerance to spot spray applications of Ultim.
This involved treating an area of approximately ˝ m2
around the center stake. This involved the same treatments,
with three replications. Treatment 2 caused minimal amount
of stunting to the plants while treatment 4 caused a greater
amount of stunt growth in the plants. The expected project
completion for this project is 2000.
4.10.2 Broadcast Application
of Ultim to Control Black Bulrush (Demonstration Trial).
Collaborator: Andrew King, NSDAM.
The objective of this demonstration trial was to examine
the effects of a broadcast application of Ultim on Black Bulrush
present in lowbush blueberries. Plot size measured 2m by 5m.
There were two Ultim application times, the first in June
1999, and the second in September 1999. The two treatments
tested were as follows: (1) 67g/ 200L of water/ha; and (2)
134 g/200L of water. There were no replications of the treatments.
Crop tolerance and weed control were rated using the Expert
Committee on Weeds, 0-9 Rating Scale. The results of the June
application showed that there was moderate injury, noticed
by the bronzing of the leaves. This application also appeared
to prevent the Black Bulrush from flowering. The expected
project completion for this demonstration was 1999.
4.11 Research Project: Dr.
Sonia Gaul
Dr. Sonia Gaul,
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Kentville, NS
4.11.1 Improved IPM of the Blueberry
Fruit Fly.
Collaborators: Lorne Crozier, NSDAM; Dr. K. MacKenzie,
AAFC; cooperating blueberry growers.
The interception of the blueberry fruit fly, Rhagoletis
mendax Curran, before the female adult lays eggs in the developing
fruit is the basis of the insect control strategy for this
pest of lowbush blueberries. Studies in 1999 have investigated
the influence of trap type and trap spacing on the interception
of adults of the blueberry fruit fly in commercial lowbush
blueberry fields, including the NSWBI site, and the influence
of mulch type on the emergence pattern of the blueberry fruit
fly in caged field plots. The Pherocon yellow sticky trap
is the more effective trap type of two yellow sticky cards
tested. Blueberry fruit flies emerged earlier from sand mulch
than from sawdust or bark mulch. Trap spacing trials are ongoing.
5. FIELD STATION ACTIVITIES
Andrew King, Field Manager, NSWBI,
Sara Reid, Research and Extension Assistant, NSWBI
Sara Reid was employed by the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry Institute
for the summer months of 1999. Heather Allen worked part of
the summer, and was provided by the Wild Blueberry Producers'
Association of Nova Scotia.
Some of the research projects on site in 1999 included:
- Drought/Irrigation Study
- Winter and Frost Injury
- Effects of Phosphorus
- Ammonium Fertilizer Experiment
- Carbon Assimilation Study
- Acid Rain Study
- Long Term Pruning Trials
- Erosion Study
- Vegetation Management
- Black Bulrush Trials
- Growth Regulators
- Fruit Fly Trapping Study
- Fall versus Spring Fertilization
- Two versus Three-Year Management
- Leaf Gas Exchange/Photosynthesis
- Herbicide Effect on Native Plants and Living Mulches
- Effects of Fertilizer, Lime and Gypsum
Some demonstration projects included:
- Long Term Pruning Trials
- Weed Collection
- Select Clones
- Equipment
- Hybrid Seeding Plots
The front field was harvested in 1999 and averaged 4,808
lbs/acre (25,445 lbs/5.5 acres). A newly developed site across
the road was harvested for the first time (patch picked).
Visitors on site included growers, researchers, students
and interest groups.
The new land acquired by the Nova Scotia Wild Blueberry
Institute has developed considerably since it was cleared
in 1994. Plant growth and spread seem to be very rapid on
this land. The left hand part of this field was harvested
for the first time in 1998, and the right hand side for the
first time in 1999. 6. RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT FUND From 1992 to 1999,
numerous projects received funding from the Nova Scotia Wild
Blueberry Institute Research and Development Fund, totalling
$102,400. 7. NOVA
SCOTIA BLUEBERRY INSTITUTE FINANCIAL REPORTS
7.1
Nova Scotia Blueberry Institute
Financial Report
Operating Fund
As of March 31, 1999 to February 29, 2000
| Balance: |
March 31, 1999 |
|
$ 35,063.55 |
| Revenue (1999): |
|
|
|
|
NS Dept of Agriculture
& Marketing (grant) |
$20,000.00 |
|
|
WBPANS (grant) |
4,000.00 |
|
|
Sale of Blueberry
Crop |
15,377.10 |
|
|
Internship Reindorsement
(HRDC) |
5,000.00 |
|
| Total Revenue: |
|
|
$ 44,377.10 |
| Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Casual Employee
Wages and Benefits |
6,494.51 |
|
|
Internship Wages |
10,000.00 |
|
|
General Operating |
1,060.01 |
|
|
Custom Work (services) |
1,166.40 |
|
|
Telephone |
422.21 |
|
|
Electricity (imcomplete) |
976.19 |
|
| Total Expenses: |
|
|
($
20,119.32) |
| Balance: |
February 29, 2000 |
|
$ 59,321.33 |
7.2
Nova Scotia Blueberry Institute
Financial Report
Research and Development Fund
As of March 31, 1999 to February 29, 2000
| Balance: |
March 31, 1999 |
|
$ 7,800.00 |
| Expenses (1999): |
|
|
|
| Total Expenses: |
|
|
($
0.00) |
| Balance: |
February 29, 2000 |
|
$7,800.00 |
8. WILD
BLUEBERRY RESEARCH PROJECTS FOR 2000-2001
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Kentville, Nova Scotia
- Dr. Andrew Jamieson
- Developing Seed-Propagated Lowbush Blueberry Cutlivars
for Canada. (Collaborators: Dr. K. Jensen, AAFC;
Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC; Private Companies in Testing)
- Dr. Peter Hicklenton
- A Quantitative Assessment of Freeze Tolerance
in Blossoms of Wild Blueberry. (Collaborators:
Dr. L. J. Eaton, NSAC; Dr. Peter Havard, NSAC; Julia
Reekie, AAFC; Dr. K. MacKenzie, AAFC)
- Strategies for Wild Blueberry Field Re-Colonization
(Collaborators: Julia Reekie, AAFC)
- Dr. Kenna MacKenzie
- Bee Diversity and Abundance in Lowbush Blueberry
(Collaborators: WBPANS)
- Blueberry Stem Gall Ecology (Collaborators:
David Hayman, Graduate Student, Acadia)
- Site Specific Management for Lowbush Blueberry
(Collaborators: Dr. K. Jensen, AAFC; Dr. P. Hicklenton,
AAFC; Dr. L.J. Eaton, NSAC; WBPANS; and various
others)
- Dr. Kenna MacKenzie and Steve Javorek
- Alfalfa Leafcutting Bee Research (Collaborators:
Wayne Goerzen, Saskatchewan Alfalfa Seed Producers
Association; Karen Strickler, Parma Research and
Extension Centre: U of Idaho; Dick Rogers, NSDAM;
Bill Thomas, NSDAM; Keith Crowe; Hoeg Farm Ltd.;
Bruce Mowatt; P. Eggerman; Don Nikonetz)
- Environmental Management Strategy for the Conservation
and Enhancement of Indigenous Bees
- Investigating Osmiine Bees for Blueberry Production
- Dr. Willy Kalt
- Health-Protective Bioactivities of Vaccinium Polyphenolics
(Collaborators: Dr. A. Howell, Rutgers, The State
University; Dr. I. Goldman, University of Wisconsin)
- Fractionation of Bioactive Flavonoids from Wild
Blueberries (Collaborators: Jim Joseph (project
leader), USDA at Tufts University; Dr. S. MacKinnon,
AAFC; M.A.L. Smith, University of Illinois)
- Antioxidant Capacity of Minor Fruit Crop Species
(Collaborators: Dr. C. Forney, AAFC)
- Effect of Blueberry Fruit Maturity on Antioxidant
Capacity (Collaborators: Dr. C. Forney, AAFC)
- Resveratol Content of Vaccinium Species (Collaborators:
Dr. A. Rimando, USDA-ARS, MS)
- Dr. Klaus Jensen
- Occurrence, Management, and Control of Native
Grasses in Nova Scotia Lowbush Blueberry Fields.
(Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival (project leader),
NSAC; Glen Sampson (project leader), NSAC; Gary
Brown, Bragg Lumber Company; Andrew King, NSDAM)
- Control of Black Bulrush with Ultim
- Dr. Robert Stark
- Optimum Juice Extraction Processing (Collaborators:
Katherine Sandford, AAFC)
- Dr. Sonia Gaul
- Improved IPM of the Blueberry Fruit Fly in Lowbush
Blueberry (Collaborators: Dr. E. Estabrooks,
Agropreneurs Inc.; Lorne Crozier, NSDAM; Dr. K.
MacKenzie, AAFC; Dr. Kenneth Neil; WBPANS)
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Charlottetown, PEI
- Kevin Sanderson
- Effects of Fertilizer and Gypsum on Blueberries
(98-2) (Collaborator: Dr. Leonard Eaton, NSAC)
- Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, Nova Scotia
- Cory Murphy
- Soil and Plant Response to MSW Compost Applications
on Lowbush Blueberry Fields. (Collaborator: Dr.
P.R. Warman, NSAC; Dr. L.J. Eaton, NSAC; Dr. G.W.
Stratton, NSAC)
- Ryan Ring
- A Comparison of Five Extraction Methods for Determining
Available Soil Phosphorus in Nova Scotia Blueberry
Soils. (Collaborators: Dr. P.R. Warman, NSAC;
Dr. G.W. Stratton, NSAC; Dr. L.J. Eaton, NSAC)
- Peter Burgess
- Efficacy and Crop Phytotoxicity of Several Herbicides
on Commercial Wild Blueberries Vaccinium angustifolium
Ait. and Introduced Living Mulches.(Collaborators:
Glen Sampson, co-supervisor, NSAC; Dr. D. Percival,
co-supervisor, NSAC; Andrew King, NSWBI; and Sara
Reid, NSWBI)
- Glen Sampson
- Vegetation Management in Lowbush Blueberries.(Collaborators:
Peter Burgess, NSAC; Dr. D. Percival, NSAC)
- Control of Bunchberry and Other Weeds in Lowbush
Blueberries. (Collaborators: Peter Burgess,
NSAC)
- Dr. Leonard Eaton
- Long Term Herbicide and Fertilizer Study at Parrsboro
(79-2).(Collaborators: Ryan Ring, NSAC; Dr. P.R.Warman,
NSAC; Dr. G. W. Stratton, NSAC)
- Two Versus Three-Year Management at Debert and
Mt. Thom (89-1) (Collaborators: Andrew King,
NSDAM; Doug Wyllie, Bragg Lumber Company)
- Residual Effects of Fertilizer Applications (97-1).
(Collaborators: Kevin Sanderson, AAFC; Gary Brown,
Bragg Lumber Company, Morris Lloy)
- Effects of Winter Injury and Frosts on Blueberries.
(Collaborators: Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC; Dr.
K. MacKenzie, AAFC; Dr. R. Olson, NSAC; Dr. P. Havard,
NSAC; Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company; Doug Wyllie,
Bragg Lumber Compnay; Clarence Calder, Morris Lloy,
Kevin Sanderson, AAFC; and others)
- Effects of Mulches on Spread of Blueberries. (Collaborators:
Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC; Andrew King, NSDAM)
- Rates of Phosphorus (92-1). (Collaborators:
Kevin Sanderson, AAFC; Dr. G.W. Stratton, NSAC;
Dr. P.R. Warman, NSAC; Ryan Ring, NSAC)
- Influence of Summer and Fall Boron Applications
on Blueberries (98-5). Collaborators: Doug Wyllie,
Bragg Lumber Company; Robbie Glen, C.L. Stonehouse;
Dr. H. Ju, NSAC; Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC
- Pruning Methods for Wild Blueberries. (Collaborators:
Doug Wyllie, Bragg Lumber Company; Robbie Glen,
C.L. Stonehouse; Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company)
- Influence of Sand/Soil on Blueberry Growth, Development
and Spread. (Collaborators: Morris Lloy; Gary
Brown, Bragg Lumber Company)
- Erosion in Blueberry Fields. (Collaborators:
Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company; Perley Hamilton;
Bruce Mowatt; others)
- Effects of Salt on Winter Damage in Blueberries.
(Collaborators: Kevin Sanderson, AAFC; Dr. J.
Hoyle, NSAC; Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company)
- Site Specific Management of Wild Blueberries.
(Collaborators: Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company;
Gary Patterson, AAFC; Dr. R. Gordon, NSAC; Carl
Esau, NSDAM; Andrew King, NSDAM; Dale McIsaac, NSDAM;
Lorne Crozier, NSDAM; Billy Malay, NSAC; Dr. K.
MacKenzie, AAFC; Dr. K. Jensen, AAFC; Dr. P. Hicklenton,
AAFC; Rick Delbridge, NSDAM; Dr. Nancy Nickerson,
AAFC; Dr. Paul Hildebrand, AAFC)
- Effects of Mosses on Wild Blueberries. (Collaborators:
Katriona MacNeil, NSAC; Andrew King, NSDAM; Dale
McIsaac, NSDAM; Gary Patterson, AAFC; Dr. D. Percival,
NSAC; Glen Sampson, NSAC; Dr. P. Hicklenton, AAFC;
Dr. K Jensen, AAFC; Gary Brown, Bragg Lumber Company)
- Pollinating Wild Blueberries Profitably. (Collaborators:
Diane Dunlop, NSAC; John Tait, NSAC; Doug Wyllie,
Bragg Lumber Company; Graham Wood, Bragg Lumber
Company; others)
- The Effect of High Phosphorus on Mycorrizhal Associations.
(Collaborators: Klaus Hillenbrand, Daltech; Dr.
P. Hicklenton, AAFC)
- Dr. David Percival
- Influence of Nitrogen Formulation and Application
Date on the Plant Nutrition, Growth and Development,
and Yield of Wild Blueberries(Collaborators:
NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company)
- Angela Dryden
- Impact of simulated acid rain on photochemistry,
morphology, and yield components of the lowbush
blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.).(Collaborators:
NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company)
- Bonna Jordan
- Impact of Living Mulches on the Environment and
Growth Dynamics of the Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium
angustifolium Ait.).(Vaccinium angustifolium
Ait.).(Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival, supervisor,
NSAC; Gary Patterson, AAFC; Gordon Brewster, NSAC;
NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company)
- Cheryl Konoff
- Seasonal Changes in Nutrient Dynamics of Wild
Blueberry Production.(Collaborators: Dr. D. Percival,
supervisor, NSAC; NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber
Company)
- Lindsay Hainstock
- Getting Back to Basics: Carbon Assimilation and
Allocation in Wild Blueberry Plants. (Collaborators:
Dr. D. Percival, supervisor, NSAC; J.P. Privé, AAFC;
Dr. N. Crowe, NSAC; NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber
Company )
- Vimy Glass
- Effect of Soil Moisture on the Growth and Development
of the Lowbush Blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium
Ait. - A Field Study. (Collaborators: Dr. D.
Percival, supervisor, NSAC; John Proctor, U of Guelph;
J.P. Privé, AAFC; and Dr. R. Olson, NSAC; NSWBI;
WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company)
- Influence of Decreasing Soil Moisture on Stem
Water Potential, Transpiration Rate, and NCER of
the Lowbush Blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium
Ait. - A Controlled Environment Study.(Collaborators:
Dr. D. Percival (supervisor), NSAC; John Proctor,
U of Guelph; J.P. Privé, AAFC; Dr. R. Olson, NSAC;
NSWBI; WBPANS; and Bragg Lumber Company)
- Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing
- Dick Rogers
- Pollinating Lowbush Blueberries Using Honey Bees(Collaborator:
John Arnold, NSDAM; Joanne Moran, NSDAM; Dr. K.
MacKenzie, AAFC; Monique VanStaden, Beekeeper; Tom
Cosman, Beekeeper; Don Amirault, Beekeeper)
- Bee$Pay: Honey Bee Stocking Rate Calculator Validation
and Training. (Collaborators: Dr. K. MacKenzie,
AAFC; Dale McIsaac, NSDAM)
- Lorne Crozier
- Evaluation of Sweep Net Techniques for Sampling
Lowbush Blueberry. (Collaborators: Summer Student,
NSDAM; various growers)
- A Study of the Leaf Beetle Triachus atomus (Suffrian),
Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae, in Lowbush Blueberry.
(Collaborators: Summer Student, NSDAM; various
growers)
- Lori Kittilsen and Dale McIsaac
- Nova Scotia Farm Management Analysis Project:
Lowbush Blueberry Industry.(Collaborators: Sara
Reid, NSWBI; Andrew King, NSDAM)
- Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia
- Sam VanderKloet
- Recruitment Strategies in Vaccinium angustifolium
in Eastern North America
- Private Researchers and Consultants
- Lise LeBlanc, Casey's Research Consulting
- Investigation of Alternative Pronone Formulations
on Lowbush Blueberries - Year 2
Return to NSWBI
Reports |